Litigation Details for Easton Baseball Softball Inc v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co. (C.D. Cal. 2015)

Easton Baseball Softball Inc v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co. (C.D. Cal. 2015)

Docket		Date Filed	2015-11-30
Court	District Court, C.D. California	Date Terminated	2016-10-12
Cause	15:1126 Patent Infringement	Assigned To	Manuel Lawrence Real
Jury Demand	Both	Referred To	Gail J. Standish
Parties	WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO.
Patents	8,480,519; 8,795,108
Attorneys	Gabrielle E Bina
Link to Docket	External link to docket

Details for Easton Baseball Softball Inc v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co. (C.D. Cal. 2015)

Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
0000-00-00				External link to document
2016-01-26	15		COUNT I 14 (Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,480,519) 15 8. Easton… U.S. Patent No. 8,480,519, 21 which was duly and lawfully issued by the United States Patent and Trademark…admits that the United States Patent Office issued U.S. 26 Patent No. 8,480,519. Regarding the remaining…Wilson’s 12 non-infringement of, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,480,519 and 8,795,108. Accordingly, this 13 Court…equivalents, or otherwise, any claim of U.S. Patent No. 8,480,519; 28	External link to document
2016-02-21	22		non-infringement of, U.S. Patent Nos. 23 8,480,519 (“the ‘519 patent”) and 8,795,108 (“the ‘108 patent). Easton denies…Wilson’s 17 non-infringement of, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,480,519 and 8,795,108. Accordingly, this 18 Court…denies that 24 the ‘519 patent or the ‘108 patent are invalid or not infringed by Wilson. Easton 25 …of the ‘519 Patent, so that Wilson may ascertain its rights 2 relevant to the ‘519 Patent. 3 … of the ‘519 Patent are invalid for failure to meet the 12 conditions of patentability, or otherwise	External link to document